In appreciation of audiences.
Sep. 19th, 2011 04:23 amI read a pretty off-the-mark blog post on what Tumblr says about us collectively and as individuals. Post is here; you can see my response to it in the comments. In a nutshell, I think that the sort of reflexive microblogging that Tumblr encourages is the closest thing we're ever going to have to telepathy. If you want to get a peak inside someone's skull, follow their Tumblr.
But there's another point the blog post brings up that got me thinking. He talks about how sad it is that people would pursue happiness by collecting gifs, reposting videos, sharing jokes and stories that other people made up and exhorts people to go out and make and do things on their own. There's a lot of privileged assumption right there, but apart from that...
Who would appreciate it if they did?
In his critique of the Tumblrverse, he has positioned the act of receiving art, of appreciating creativity, as a sad and passive failure of human potential. This can't be a mere consequence of location. We have to assume that one who views pictures in a museum for happiness while not creating any is demonstrating a similar level of failure. If a play with a cast and crew of two dozen is watched by an audience of two hundred, think about what that says about us as a species. Just 12% of the people in the building had the gumption to get up and put on a show while the rest sat on their behinds and watched? Gasp! Where is Tyler Durden when we need him most?
Art requires appreciation. Appreciation requires art. Tumblr is a social platform, but it's also a content distribution system. The fact that it's mostly audience is not a flaw in the design of Tumblr. It's a feature in the design of art.
But there's another point the blog post brings up that got me thinking. He talks about how sad it is that people would pursue happiness by collecting gifs, reposting videos, sharing jokes and stories that other people made up and exhorts people to go out and make and do things on their own. There's a lot of privileged assumption right there, but apart from that...
Who would appreciate it if they did?
In his critique of the Tumblrverse, he has positioned the act of receiving art, of appreciating creativity, as a sad and passive failure of human potential. This can't be a mere consequence of location. We have to assume that one who views pictures in a museum for happiness while not creating any is demonstrating a similar level of failure. If a play with a cast and crew of two dozen is watched by an audience of two hundred, think about what that says about us as a species. Just 12% of the people in the building had the gumption to get up and put on a show while the rest sat on their behinds and watched? Gasp! Where is Tyler Durden when we need him most?
Art requires appreciation. Appreciation requires art. Tumblr is a social platform, but it's also a content distribution system. The fact that it's mostly audience is not a flaw in the design of Tumblr. It's a feature in the design of art.