I didn't ask you to apologize for unintended offense. I asked you to apologize for what you did, which was to completely mischaracterize what I was saying.

Pyrtolin's response was based on publicly available information that your nonsensical emotionally overwrought post fueled not by any economic insight but by the nonsensical emotionally overwrought fearmongering against the public option would have us believe simply doesn't exist because no one's discussing it.

You've had almost two weeks to exercise one of the three options outlined above and you haven't. I don't care any longer, though.