Nobody's actually asked me that recently, but I'm posing the question to myself to avoid permanently digressing somebody else's post with a long discussion in comments.
The short answer is that I don't feel it's reclaimable.
I don't think it would be worth reclaiming if it were... I mean, that presupposes there's some kind of redeeming value to be had. This word has no cultural history. It makes no linguistic or etymological sense... if she plus male meant "chick with dick", then so should "fe-male".
But I don't feel it would be possible to "reclaim" it, in a meaningful way, right now. It has too many claims on it as it is. Apart from being used as a horrible, hateful, hurtful slur, it's also in use in the porn industry to advertise the worst kind of exploitation of transwomen, and it's also apparently used by fetish fiction writers and chatroom chasers as (I'm told) what's supposed to be an innocent term of endearment for an ideal of beautiful women with giant cocks.
Sorry, but I'm not fighting all those people off for an identification I don't need or want. They want the word? They can have it. It's useless. It means nothing to me... and so I'd say it's no skin off my back if some other transwoman decides to take it upon herself to reclaim it, but... it is skin off my back. Nobody else can tell me it's not. If there's one thing I know, it's the feeling of having my back skinned. If somebody else chooses to use it as a label, that affects all of us.
It's all very well and good for a secure, fully transitioned transwoman living in a stable environment to take it upon herself to "reclaim" it... but once the label's present in a community, that creates a barrier to participation for the more vulnerable members, for the people who have the least support and the most damage... the people who are still finding themselves, who still reel every time they see it.
I don't see how the benefit to those secure enough to feel comfortable "reclaiming" a slur outweighs the damage. If the people doing the reclaiming are fine with that, that's their choice. I mean, they don't owe anybody else anything.
And the damage spreads, because the would-be reclaimer becomes the authority who's invoked by other people who insist they should be able to throw it around with even less consideration.
If somebody decides to use a word like that as their screenname because they're being ~*edgy*~ and ~*ironic*~ and they think it's hilarious to name themselves after a porn genre because then "tranny chasers" message them thinking that they must be some kind of idealized porn figure who exists for male fantasies, I don't see that as a political statement... I see that as another kid on the internet trolling for lulz with no consideration of the larger impact of their actions.
Because that shit splatters. It gets on all of us. No, it isn't every individual transperson's job to go around ejumacatin' folks on proper forms of address and on the fact that our existence serves other purposes than being fap-and-fuck fodder for fetishists... but is it too much to fucking ask that we don't go around undoing whatever minimal education exists just for fun?
Yeah, it's important for marginalized folks to be able to laugh at what we go through, but it stops being a private in-joke when it's conducted in public.
The short answer is that I don't feel it's reclaimable.
I don't think it would be worth reclaiming if it were... I mean, that presupposes there's some kind of redeeming value to be had. This word has no cultural history. It makes no linguistic or etymological sense... if she plus male meant "chick with dick", then so should "fe-male".
But I don't feel it would be possible to "reclaim" it, in a meaningful way, right now. It has too many claims on it as it is. Apart from being used as a horrible, hateful, hurtful slur, it's also in use in the porn industry to advertise the worst kind of exploitation of transwomen, and it's also apparently used by fetish fiction writers and chatroom chasers as (I'm told) what's supposed to be an innocent term of endearment for an ideal of beautiful women with giant cocks.
Sorry, but I'm not fighting all those people off for an identification I don't need or want. They want the word? They can have it. It's useless. It means nothing to me... and so I'd say it's no skin off my back if some other transwoman decides to take it upon herself to reclaim it, but... it is skin off my back. Nobody else can tell me it's not. If there's one thing I know, it's the feeling of having my back skinned. If somebody else chooses to use it as a label, that affects all of us.
It's all very well and good for a secure, fully transitioned transwoman living in a stable environment to take it upon herself to "reclaim" it... but once the label's present in a community, that creates a barrier to participation for the more vulnerable members, for the people who have the least support and the most damage... the people who are still finding themselves, who still reel every time they see it.
I don't see how the benefit to those secure enough to feel comfortable "reclaiming" a slur outweighs the damage. If the people doing the reclaiming are fine with that, that's their choice. I mean, they don't owe anybody else anything.
And the damage spreads, because the would-be reclaimer becomes the authority who's invoked by other people who insist they should be able to throw it around with even less consideration.
If somebody decides to use a word like that as their screenname because they're being ~*edgy*~ and ~*ironic*~ and they think it's hilarious to name themselves after a porn genre because then "tranny chasers" message them thinking that they must be some kind of idealized porn figure who exists for male fantasies, I don't see that as a political statement... I see that as another kid on the internet trolling for lulz with no consideration of the larger impact of their actions.
Because that shit splatters. It gets on all of us. No, it isn't every individual transperson's job to go around ejumacatin' folks on proper forms of address and on the fact that our existence serves other purposes than being fap-and-fuck fodder for fetishists... but is it too much to fucking ask that we don't go around undoing whatever minimal education exists just for fun?
Yeah, it's important for marginalized folks to be able to laugh at what we go through, but it stops being a private in-joke when it's conducted in public.