Mar. 23rd, 2011

alexandraerin: (Default)
The question used to be "Can self-publishing ever have the legitimacy of traditional publishing?"

Now it's becoming increasingly apparent that the real question is: what is legitimacy?

Can I spread it on bread and eat it as a sandwich? Can I pay the rent with it? Can I burn it to provide heat, light, and/or energy to power the gadgets that run my life?

If not, then why is it worth giving up so much money, so much control, so much of the chance to make an actual living at one's craft that so many authors are still chasing after it?

I say again as I always say that self-publishing is not a surefire path to fame and fortune, but there isn't such a beast. Self-publishing is merely an alternate route. It perhaps requires a slightly different skill set, but that's not as true as it seems and it's less true all the time.

I mean, I've long wondered how I'm managing to succeed when I'm really not that good a marketer. I'm socially inept. I don't like putting myself forward. I have long rambling arguments with people I've never met. If you meet me in person, I probably won't smile much or look directly at your face. I'm just not a natural schmoozer.

But there's a phrase I'm seeing being bandied about that really sums up my success. I'm trying to find it, but I've seen so many links in the past few days on the subject... I believe it was Joe Konrath (publishes as J.A. Konrath) who said it, but I'm not going to swear to that. I may have seen him quoting someone else saying it. It basically boils down to the idea that the best marketing is writing. The best way to attract readers is to put more material out, in other words. Each bit you have is another thing that someone can stumble across, and more importantly, it's something that will keep them reading.

Again, there are no guarantees. You can't just start typing and throw it up and say "I wrote a million billion books, where are my readers?" But people... no matter what any doom-and-gloom Idiocracy-watching cynics say... are readers by nature. I don't mean to say that every human being is literate or that we all enjoy the habit of reading, but our brains are wired to seek patterns and connect with stories. We are a people of tales.

If you produce tales that are readable, people will read them.
Brevity is the soul of what? )
alexandraerin: (Default)
...that I ate your fucking plums and I'm not the least bit sorry that the last few chapters of Tales of MU Volume 1 are among the most difficult things I've had to write. I'm not talking about emotionally, at least not the emotions that people usually mean when they talk about how difficult it is to bring something to a close. For me this is a "moving forward" thing. There are some trade-offs. Skipping so much time means there are things that I won't get to cover directly that I might have wanted to, but I get to move on to other things. On the whole I'm happy about that.

No, the emotion is worry. I'm kind of glad I've had the distraction of The Gift of the Bad Guy to keep from obsessing over getting these chapters right. I mean, I'm emphatically not trying to wrap everything up with a neat little bow but there are certain things that I want to make sure get addressed, plot-wise and emotion-wise, before the end. What if I overlook something? What if I forget something? I know at a practical level the answer is nothing. I mean, it's not like there isn't going to be any chance to look backwards and fill in the gaps from the point of view of year two. But the worry is there.

Still, it's a lot smaller worry than I expected it to be. Again, I attribute that to how much of my worrying capacity has been occupied by other things, but also to how excited I am for volume 2. It's going to be a whole lot of fun.
alexandraerin: (Default)
News For Today

Today (or in calendar terms, more likely sometime tomorrow) is the second to last chapter of Tales of MU volume 1. That could go under "plans for today" but really it feels like news.

As the rather large volume of LJ posts I've made in the past few days indicates, I've had a lot of brain activity lately that is more focused on the business side of my work than the writing side. By this I mean both the larger business of writing/publishing and the way I do business myself. One thing that's interesting to me is to realize that I started Tales of MU just a few months before the Kindle went on sale, and maybe a year before Smashwords was a thing. As a result of being focused on carving out my niche with free, blog-based content I really missed out on the potential there.

I don't think anyone can say that I "missed the boat"... these things are paradigm-changing marketplaces that still exist. The boat is still there, in other words. I'm not even sure I missed an opportunity. I took an opportunity. The area I focused on ended up being profitable for me. And now when I step into the Kindle-world, I already have a readership who can review and "like" and such my stuff there. Moving from one self-pub model to another is a leg up, in the same way that moving from a trad-pub career to self-pub is.

Also on the subject of how I do business: I got a question in a reply email from one purchaser of The Gift of the Bad Guy who wondered why I'm doing email fulfillment instead of an automated content delivery system.

Well, the time will come when for practical purposes I'll have to switch over, but as long as LitSnacks is small enough to do it on my own I'd like to do that because it forces me to develop processes for doing so. Not to get all Calvin's Dad, but it builds character. It builds skills, or revives skills that I haven't used since I had people above me who provided processes and tied my compensation to my ability to follow them. I've handled the MU diploma program badly every time I've tried to run it. I have three still-owed ones that I need to mail out on Friday, and the most I can say is that they're not the same three ones I owed people last time I said this. After that, I believe I'm shutting it down for the time being. The whole thing depends on things that are too far outside my natural skill set and inclination. It's good to stretch yourself, but to play on two different meanings of "stretch", it's good to stretch before you try to stretch too far. Warm-up, you know?

You know, when you're working in a cubicle farm and there's this flow chart you're supposed to follow every time an item comes across your desk or whatever, maybe you think, "Pffft, I know how to do my job. This is just busy work. It's a bunch of hand-holding nonsense."

But man, having a process to follow... well, in putting together someone's Author Appreciation Edition(s), there's not that much to it. It takes seconds, not minutes of work. But absent a process to do it, I might spend a minute getting the files in order and then more time checking and double-checking to make sure I got everything right. I'm not suggesting that checking my work is a bad thing. I'm saying that without a process I end up going, "Wait... did I check...?" Maybe I did, several times. Maybe I didn't once, but I'm remembering having checked the last one.

When I started doing the AAEs, I didn't have a process. By the time I finished them, a de facto one had evolved.

Skills acquired. I also had a blinding flash of obvious about the nature of "labels" in Gmail and how they're not folders and what that means. It's a serious "this changes everything" moment, you have no idea.

All this is to say that I'm adding structure to my work life that wasn't there before.

Personal Assessment

Kind of feel slow today, mentally and physically. It's not the "still waking up" kind of slowness, but I got up recently enough that waking up more might yet alleviate it. We'll see.

Random Link

Blue canary on the outlet by the lightswitch who watches over you."

Plans For Today

Chapter 496 of Tales of MU, though I'm going to call this one for Thursday. I know I've said it before, but I really thought I would have The Gift of the Bad Guy all wrapped up with a neat bow before Monday. But I was working frantically on that Monday, and Tuesday I was more or less coming down from that. If I had all day today to do nothing but write I could get the chapter turned out but it's 4 in the afternoon and I'm just waking up. If this were just another chapter I'd be pretty sure I could turn it in not too long after midnight anyway, but it's not. I have two chapters left and some fairly specific notes I need to hit in them, as well as a general sense that there are important things that need working out as I write them.

I've rarely if ever had anyone complain when I say "I want to take the time to get this right." I've had complaints about delays but never about that reasoning. And it's never been more true than it is now. Ending volume 1 is a fairly pragmatic decision, creatively, but that doesn't mean it doesn't deserve the best send off I can give it.
alexandraerin: (Default)
I just removed a Facebook status I made about Rebecca Black's video Friday, which I'd been ignoring/overlooking up to this point. I don't really pay attention to music trends. Pop music's not my specific thing. I'm not one of the types who's scathingly critical of music for being popular or commercial. Sometimes I encounter pop music that I like. Again, I say it's not my specific thing.

But two people on my Wall were talking about her, so I Googled the original video and found it. The thing that struck me about it was that the lyrics and video matched up in a really obvious and banal way that reminded me of the "literal video" trend, where the bizarre imagery of a typical music video is described by parody lyrics. The best example (in terms of both quality and humor) of this that I know is the Total Eclipse of the Heart one. The Facebook post I made was a play on this. I took it down because however amusing this is to me, I don't care to be part of either the hype or the ridicule that's swirling around this young woman.

I do want to talk about the phenomenon, though, and to do that I need to start this post by mentioning two very important things that I learned approximately five seconds after noticing Rebecca Black and her video existed. I'm mentioning these things because six seconds after I noticed their existence, I realized a lot of people talking about her and the video don't know these things.

The first is that Rebecca Black is a thirteen-year-old girl, and no, that's not cause for mockery.

Or rather, it is but it shouldn't be.

To be a thirteen-year-old girl in our society is almost categorically to be the subject of cruel mockery. That doesn't change if you're "the popular girl" instead of "the outcast", if a Platonic School exists somewhere that these classes are absolute. The popular girls are being viciously mocked by the outcasts. I'm not trying to say that they go through equal amounts of social hell, but it takes a naive understanding of sociology and psychology to think that popular, conventionally attractive tween/teenage girls aren't harmed by the ridicule directed at them.

I'm also not saying that thirteen-year-old boys aren't the targets of scorn and ridicule. They are. Among the list of failures of the United States education system, the failure to provide a safe environment for anyone is pretty high on the list, and it contributes to the other failures. But this is a case of intersectionality. Intersecting pressures and prejudices don't add, they multiply. Young women are under more pressure from more directions, and bullying tends to hit the same pressure points that are already weakened.

So, no mockery of Rebecca Black from me. And none from you who are reading this. Not here. Not in space that I control.

The second important thing is that she didn't write the lyrics or direct the video, no matter how DIY it seems. These were handed to her by ARK Music Factory, which advertises itself as an indie record label but is actually a vanity press for would-be musicians. It's like those places in the mall where you can go and have a CD or DVD made of yourself singing a popular song in front of a bluescreened background or whatever (Do those places still exist? Did they ever? I've only ever seen them in TV shows.), except they charge you thousands of dollars and represent themselves as a place that can help launch a career.

The song is seriously shitty. The video is equally shitty. The reason for this is because they were produced by a company that exists to part people from their money as efficiently as possible, and you don't do that by spending a lot of money on songwriters and cinematographers. The verses of the song are blatantly filler. The refrains aren't actual refrains. They are imitations of a refrain written by someone who has heard many.

Now here's where it gets interesting to me, and this is the reason why I want to talk about Rebecca Black even though I don't want to add even my small voice to the firestorm around here. If I just felt bad about the status update I would have deleted it.

But as I said, here's the interesting thing.

Like Douglas Adams's "holistic detective" Dirk Gently, ARK Music has managed to accidentally deliver on their scam. Thanks to the magical intersection of YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, and assholes on the internet, Rebecca Black's a star. Sure, she's getting reamed by the interneluminati and panned by critics... but hey, so are lots of legitimate musical acts.

And in fact, while we can pinpoint how and why the lyrics suck so badly, the fact is that it's hard to find anything bad to say about Rebecca Black that isn't a focused microcosm of the general criticism that pop music tends to receive.

So here's the question: her utterly manufactured celebrity, her fame that is utterly divorced from whatever creative talents she may or may not have... is Rebecca Black somehow a less legitimate sensation than the Spice Girls, or the Monkees, or any number of boy bands or girl bands or pop stars who were manufactured on purpose, by people on the inside of the music industry making deliberate and cynical use of its apparatus?

Please don't jump in to tell me about how talented members of the Monkees were. I'm not saying they weren't. I'm saying their talents didn't make them famous. Men in suits made them famous. Their genuine talent was incidental and in fact a little inconvenient.

The difference between those examples and Rebecca Black? Well, apart from the fact that the full extent of her talent has yet to be seen, the main difference is she doesn't have the men in suits backing her. ARK Music, yes, but they probably didn't expect more than from her than any client whose check they cashed, and that would mainly be the check and some more referrals from their friends and relatives before the shine wears off the dream. They aren't savvy insiders in the business of creating genuine stars. It's like the difference between being an actual kingmaker and being the casting director for a community playhouse production of Richard III.

If Rebecca had been positioned for stardom by insiders, she might have slightly better lyrics... or at least lyrics that are awful in conventionally acceptable ways. The overprocessing in post-production of her voice would be better done, but it would still be just as overprocessed. The video would probably be horrible in ways that go way beyond being banal. And the same corners of the internet that are eviscerating her now would be eviscerating her. Given the number of "how did she get a music deal?" comments I've seen while writing this post, it seems likely that a good number of the people tearing her down don't realize she's not actually a typical pop starlet. There are plenty who do know at the very least that her video is "an internet thing", but be honest: if you heard the song for the first time on a Top 40 radio station, would you be thinking "Clearly this is some internet nobody's song that somehow was played by accident here." or would you be thinking it simply reflected the state of the pop music industry that this sort of thing can end up on the radio?

I don't know if radios are playing it, but her song's on iTunes, and I have to believe that some people are buying it, given the number of people talking about it. Some people are enjoying it unironically... as I've said in a previous post, the thing that you think is the shittiest thing in the world is somebody else's favorite thing. Yeah, more people are listening to it for free on YouTube or downloading it from a friend or peer-to-peer network, but the thing about iTunes and similar services is that they're cheap enough and convenient enough that they twig as "practically free" to a lot of people on the level where snap decisions are made. (Shades of the e-book price discussion here.)

She's now performed her song on Good Morning America. And much like a pageant contestant stripped of 17 layers of makeup, her voice turns out to be a lot better without all the autotune. Not what you would call "professional quality", but careers have been built around worse voices. Will she have a career as anything other than a novelty act? Don't know. Could she have managed to start a career some other way? Don't know. But it's too early to say she's a flash-in-the-pan.

Tori Amos started out with an 80s hairband. Natalie and Nicole Appleton started out as members of All Saints. Hanson started out as Hanson. Musicians overcome their roots and re-invent themselves all the time. I don't believe... and this carries the caveat that it is based entirely on watching two performances... that Rebecca Black has the chops right now for a "serious" career, but it's worth repeating that she's thirteen and "wouldn't be able to get a scholarship to a classical conservatory based on a singing audition" or "wouldn't impress Simon Cowell" aren't the same thing as "doesn't have a voice worth listening to" or "couldn't establish a musical career".

I'll put it in very simple terms: her voice is good enough that if she were singing something I thought was worth listening to, I would listen to it. Unless you're a choral music snob or something, the same is probably true of you. I like some musicians with amazing vocal talents and ranges, and I like some who have throats that get the job done while they sing songs that I like and they sing with emotional authenticity and passion. I think this is probably true of all of us.

And yes, this echoes what I said about writing the other day. You don't have to have a "good" voice, for any objective measurement of "good" that anyone wants to propose, to be a singer. A voice that is interesting and/or inoffensive can be enough if your music speaks to people.

(More on the significance of gender: I believe that audiences are more forgiving of men who don't have "good" voices. I'm not saying there aren't women who built their careers around a distinct and unconventional sound, but society is loads more superficial when it comes to women in the spotlight than men. There are a lot more gravelly-voiced male singers than female ones. If a woman is going to sound bestial or grungy, she's also got to sound sultry while she's doing it.)

And even if this is the beginning and end of her career as a musician, she's had this experience. She's got her 15 minutes.

Now, if you're a musician trying to launch a career, I don't recommend that you seek out ARK, or anonymous assholes on the internet who will tell you to kill yourself. (You don't have to seek the latter out, anyway. They come with the gig. Anonymous internet assholes are the 21st century equivalent of "groupies".) The point of this all is more to simply say: take heart, social media exists and it is mighty. It's mighty enough to turn a scam into reality just by existing.

Profile

alexandraerin: (Default)
alexandraerin

August 2017

S M T W T F S
   12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 24th, 2025 10:43 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios