on 2009-04-07 11:19 pm (UTC)
Nowhere am I arguing that a book that sells 200 copies is the mainstream.

But the CNN article mentions two authors who went from small press/POD to success that can only be characterized as "mainstream" after the publishers who are supposedly representing the "mainstream" told them they lacked the appeal needed to sell to the "mainstream"; they only got larger book deals when it became apparent that the publishers had misjudged their appeal and relegated them to "niches".

J.K. Rowling's personal story is similar... her allegedly bland, allegedly generic little fantasy book wasn't "supposed" to have the appeal that it did.

What the publishers are addressing is the largest single segment that anybody's bothering to address. There's no natural boundary that marks this segment as a unique beast distinct from the rest of the market... decades of habit and convention have simply codified and solidified what they think their market is. There are mountains of wasted opportunity there, as J.K. Rowling's unpredicted runaway success (particularly among "non-readers") demonstrates.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

alexandraerin: (Default)
alexandraerin

August 2017

S M T W T F S
   12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 14th, 2025 07:04 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios