alexandraerin: (Default)
[personal profile] alexandraerin
I booted someone off my discussion community (and subsequently blocked a comment they tried to leave on a story) for saying, in a tangential discussion, that the word problems of racism left in the United States are "unscrupulous" minorities who play on white liberal guilt.

I've been told this joker went and whined elsewhere on the internet that I'm such a controlling bitch that anyone who dares to suggest there's been any progress regarding race relations will be subjected to a profanity-laced tirade and then banned. No, dude. Just you. And if you really had just suggested that there's been progress, I would agree. But I'd follow up that agreement with the observation that you don't win a long race by stopping after a really good sprint. In fact, to stretch that metaphor a little further, if you're not in great condition for running in the first place, that sprint can stop you in your tracks. Like when people exercise who aren't used to it, and they make a big show of cranking the treadmill up or putting a lot of weights on the bar and they make one big showy push and then go, "Whoo! That's enough of that." and then limp away, trying to pretend like they accomplished something huge.

The evidence this guy pointed to for the lack of actual, non-unscrupulous-minority-directed racism in America was the election of Barack Obama. Which, yay. Milestone. Achievement. Possibly a turning point, but it's far too early to say how big of one... especially when a lot of the folks who'd need to be turning the corner are actually stopping before they get there, limping towards the locker rooms, and slapping each other on the back while bragging about how darn fast they managed to run for that one little burst.

Found via [livejournal.com profile] karynthia:

A swimming pool kicked out a bunch of kids from a camp that had a contract to use the pool because they "changed the complexion" of the establishment.

The movie Beyond The Sea had a dramatization of Bobby Darin's advocacy on behalf of comedian George Kirby being allowed to perform the coveted opening spot as his warm-up act at the Copacabana Club, the crown jewel of the club scene. My understanding is that the broad strokes of the story are correct, but I can't pretend to know the actual details of any conversation or anyone's motivations, so understand I'm talking about the scene in the movie, not presenting it as real life. It works as metaphor.

The scene goes like this: the owner of the Copa tells Bobby Darin that it's not his policy to doesn't let colored performers perform. Bobby reminds him that Sammy Davis, Jr. just played the Copa. The owner replies, "Sammy's a headliner."

Sammy's a headliner.

A star attraction being allowed to do his thing isn't the same thing as an up-and-comer being given a fair shake, which isn't the same thing as anyone being let in through the door. When somebody achieves something, that doesn't prove that anybody can... it's when even the "nobodies" are treated fairly that we're really getting somewhere.

When "integration" means that a rich, successful man who is a darling of the media and who draws a packed house is tolerated for his ability to make a nightclub owner an awful lot of money, it's not integration. The same country that elected Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. to the highest office in the land... favoring him over the candidate who would have been succeeding an unpopular incumbent, against a candidate whose party as associated with a potentially era-defining economic crisis and a series of unpopular conflicts, against a candidate who ran a badly mismanaged campaign characterized more by a series of ill-considered stunts than anything else... also contains stories like the one linked to above.

And those are the ones that garner enough media attention to be noticed by a white person in the middle states.

I don't know how much it seems like I talk about racism, to you folks. It's not my "thing" in general, because... it doesn't have to be. If I were going to be a dedicated blogger against intolerance and injustice, I could probably think of five issues that affect me more than racism. I don't even have to think to come up with three. Any time one of us (i.e., "white us") hears the words "racial privilege" and says, "What privilege? I come from a poor background. My employer is an equal opportunity employer. I never had any advantages. What privilege?", there's a huge chunk of an answer for you: we don't have to care about this shit.

It doesn't have to matter to us that a bus load of kids can be told they're going on a fun outing and go through the trouble of putting on their swim trunks and their little bathing suits and lotioning up and finding their ear plugs and their nose clips and blowing up their arm floaties and going out into the hot sun... and then told the party's over, they have to go home.

Try telling a kid that America's "post-racial" after they've gone through that.

Of course, some people do...

It's not about race They were simply making people uncomfortable. There have been complaints. It's not that we're racist, no, see, we even hire minorities. But you're making the established clientele nervous. Wait, what? I'm sorry, but there is no need for that sort of insinuation... we're just trying to keep a happy customer base and maintain the atmosphere of our club. Why do you people always insist on making it about race? There are people with real problems in the world, and if all you have to worry about is not being allowed to go in a swimming pool, then I guess you don't have it so bad, do you?

*barf*

Do you remember what it was like to be a kid and get all excited about something and then have it snatched away? Even when there was a good reason. God, I had a fingertip cut off when it got caught in a heavy screen door when I was pre-K. We were going to the playground, which was like two houses down from our house and which we consequently got to go to about every single day, but we were going there and I was excited and my brother was excited and in our mutual excitement we managed to get a door swinging shut on my finger. I got taken to the hospital and I had my first experience with stitches and I came home looking like I was 2% mummy, which was pretty cool... and then I asked my mom, "So now we go to the playground, right?"

I think I was more devastated by being told that no, after enduring that pain and that trauma and ordeal, that it was too late and it was dark and I needed rest. That was like adding insult to injury. I don't remember the names of the people I met Tuesday night but I remember that. Disappointment sticks like nothing else.

Of course, when I got even a little bit older, I could look back and know that my mother was only being sensible. Today, I see it as a kind of a cute kids-say-the-darnedest-things, oh-they're-so-resilient story when viewed from the outside. All that pain and injury, and what I really cared about was getting to play on the jungle gym.

But imagine going through something like that, being all excited about something, and then being told no, you can't... and being crushed with disappointment... and that it's not because of something that makes any sense when you get some perspective from it...

"Not being allowed to swim in a chlorinated and filtered commercial swimming pool" might seem like the epitome of what's called a "first world problem", but the lingering effects of that kind of incredibly pointed discrimination transcend any barriers of class or economic status.

And imagine being the camp counselors who got the kids all pumped up for their outing and then have to deal with the fallout. Gah. I can imagine that, in terms of excitement and disappointment, but that's as far as I can take it.

I think [livejournal.com profile] karnythia had said all of this much better than I did, possibly many times, with much fewer words: "post-racial my ass".

But then, she's had a lot more opportunities to refine her message.

on 2009-07-11 06:22 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] alexandraerin.livejournal.com
First of all, according to the article, the club had "open enrollment". That's an imprecise term... it could just mean that they were accepting applications from the general public, or it could mean that their "application" process was pay a membership fee and join (like most fitness "clubs" and grocery store "price clubs"), no selectivity involved. That being the case, it could be a public business and not a private club.

More, these kids didn't apply for membership and they weren't turned down! The private club decided to contract with the camp for access to their pool. The fact that the club might have the backwards-ass "right" to discriminate on the basis of race* for memberships doesn't grant them the right to do so in a business they decide to operate on their premises, does it?

I am not a lawyer, but it seems to me that a club could have a shop on the premises that's only for club members, but if it's got a door on the public street and a sign that says "Public welcome!" so that "anyone" walk in and buy stuff, they can't start kicking out the people with visible disabilities or the Eastern Europeans.

If they were worried about some of the walk-ins "changing the tone", then their only recourse would be to stop allowing the general public to use their club shop.

I get the impression that the end result of the campers' first visit was that the club decided to do just this... I believe the article said they canceled contracts with other camps as well. It certainly seems like they reconsidered the whole idea.

And they only might have been within their rights to do that... I would imagine those contracts had a clause that said they could be canceled at any time for any or no reason. Either that or these are idiots with a fetish for courtrooms. The problem is... they were stupid enough to give a reason when they probably didn't have to, and they did it in a way that 1) resulted in a lot of disappointed kids and 2) put the worst possible reason on full display and given us some heart-wrenching footage of some very disappointed children.

In America, we have anti-discrimination laws and we have certain categories of people that are recognized as protected classes... using them as criteria for certain things is considered to be legally "suspect". I'm not sure how that would unfold when it's a contract between a day camp and the club... while not acting as a private club when it inks these deals with camps is also not under any obligation to give one to anybody who walks through the door... but if race is also a suspect class for such contract discrimination in that jurisdiction...

Well, I think that's an excellent reason for the government to be "looking into this", to figure out if they did break any law and what they can be hit with as a consequence.

If somebody in the government wants lawyers and investigators who are trained in the specifics of these matters to look at exactly what happened and figure out any laws that were broken and then put the wheels of justice in motion to punish those who did it... glory glory, Hallelujah. The system might actually work. In the meantime, your opinion that the right of the club to discriminate takes primacy over all else in the matter is just that... an opinion, not a balanced viewpoint or a voice of reason. It's an opinion that is siding against the angels and with the douchebags. I mean, there are people who aren't overt racists who still believe in "states' rights" to the extent that they believe the majority should be able to vote for state laws that are discriminatory against one race or sex or whatever.

on 2009-07-15 02:21 am (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] centauress.livejournal.com
This isn't really targeted at Erin, merely adding to her point.

Private clubs actually can be racist. Or sexist. Or whatever. Because they're private clubs.

The moment they take money itself in return for access, they're a public accommodation. No longer a private club. And therefore subject to the requirements that entails - disabled parking spots, ramps, health inspections, allowing police and emergency access, requirements to follow safety procedures for fire and building codes, etc.

Why? Because we made a government which watches over these things, so that you know you can walk down a road safely, eat in a restaurant safely, and not die horribly for someone else's greed in our otherwise capitalistic society.

Profile

alexandraerin: (Default)
alexandraerin

August 2017

S M T W T F S
   12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 1st, 2025 03:18 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios