alexandraerin: (Default)
The interesting thing about the Twitter chat (she said in between actually working on the website) is how it's forcibly democratic and egalitarian.

For those whose Twit Fu is even weaker than mine, everybody on Twitter is broadcasting on the same frequency. People simulate topics/channels using "hashtags", which is a hash sign and a keyword, and then you can run a search on that to see everybody who has tweeted about it in the last little bit. Some people use client programs that do running updates, like an auto-refreshing chatroom, but unlike a chatroom there's no way to keep people out of the discussion... anybody can run a search and anybody can type the tag on their post.

I only found out about this because someone I'm watching on Twitter posted and the #writechat tag interested me so I searched it, and jumped in when I saw the topics of discussion were Of Interest to me. I think I pulled a few other people in, in a similar fashion.

Anyway, because anyone can see the tag and join in, the conversation's not restricted to a single viewpoint. The individual who "hosts" (really, jumpstarts) the writer chat circle seems to represent a very by-the-book industry oriented viewpoint: if you want to be a writer, you pay someone to edit your manuscript before you try to hire an agent and then the agent gets you a deal and so on. I'm sure that works for some people, but as another person pointed out, there are agents who don't want to see edited manuscripts, they want to know exactly what they're dealing with in the raw.

There is no universal approach that will work for every person in every case, and so a diversity of voices and viewpoints is a good thing.

I did get the distinct impression that not everybody thought so, though. I got a distinct vibe from some people that they felt applecarts were being upset by the presence of radical dissent. (Dogs and cats living together, mass hysteria!) But the nature of Twitter is such that even if they don't like it they can't do anything about it.

Anybody who wants to take advantage of its open nature is going to have to cope with everything that openness entails. And if they really can't coexist with the conflicting viewpoint, well... they're probably not going to stick around themselves.
alexandraerin: (Default)
With what's going on in Iran, I feel a little funny using the word "revolution" to describe anything short of... you know... revolution... but the same word can have a different shade of meaning in different contexts. It's a fact of language in general and our glorious bastard of a language in particular.

So, with that having been said: the revolution is ongoing. Writer [livejournal.com profile] tim_pratt, another actual author with actual published books that people have held in their hands and read on a bus somewhere, has announced he will be serializing a novella for the web. The circumstances are a little familiar: out of work partner, bills mounting, money not pouring in from previously published works.

I want to point it out, but I'm probably not going to go on and on about Mr. Pratt like I have Cat Valente, both because I have less prior knowledge of him and because each time that this happens, each time that a previously published author takes to the web with a self-directed community funded project, it will be less and less of a big deal individually.

At some point, it'll just become something that authors do.

It is a truism that most people won't pay for something they can get for free on the internet, but some will, and the more people you can attract with your free content, the more paying customers you will attract. As belts tighten for everyone, the ability to "pay what you can" for good art will become increasingly appreciated. Paypal takes something like 31 cents out of a $1 donation (that's off the top of my head, it might not be exact), but a thousand people later that's still $690, isn't it? That would be rent for a lot of folks, and it's nothing to sneeze at for anybody.

Profile

alexandraerin: (Default)
alexandraerin

August 2017

S M T W T F S
   12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 7th, 2025 03:47 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios